Відео

Stop messing about and get to work.

I am going to Oxford international I am not a boy my picture is showing of my dad I am really a girl I go to Oxford international college and study there I love the teacher most is Kumari teacher I love so much that I can't stop❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I want to go to Oxford international college iodine and you have to pay 7000 it's very expensive sometimes they will ask you 10. 000 they will only ask money 💰 but they won't let you to talk with anyone you when it exam you have to parts you have to come if you don't come you are not coming in the school that happened to me I got all of them A and my Sinhala E

Heminges and Condel were given only 1 pound 40p each. How did they finance a book printing that cost >1,000 pounds? A copy of the First Folio sold for 24 pounds in 1664 so the total run of 750 copies would, at that rate, have sold for ~18,000 pounds. Cost of production was significantly less than that but certainly well above the 2 pounds 80p that Heminges and Condel had.

It occurs to me that I’ve been listening to Melvin’s history podcast for 10 years and this is the first time I’ve seen his face. Cool documentary!

What in the world is he actually saying here, can someone break this down?

He's misunderstanding time, ironic for a great physicist. If you run out of time, you lose.

I didn't realize Jonathan Penrose was Roger's brother...

The problem with this argument is that it ignores heuristics: pragmatic and informal shortcut approaches to "understanding" or knowing things, that either cannot be formally proven, or else would be prohibitively challenging to do so. Computers can be (and have been) programmed to identify things through heuristics.

One of the wisest men on the planet. There aren’t very many of them .. people who can think outside the box . You know .. real scientists who don’t accept the dogma they were trained to believe about the nature of reality. See his theories on a cyclic model of the Universe and how consciousness may be mediated in the brain/body via quantum processes. But note .. not manufactured by the brain. There is no evidence that the brain secretes or manufactures consciousness. Only people who haven’t looked at the evidence propose that and … no one knows how to “make” consciousness from LEGO like “dead” atoms. How do you make awareness from Lego ?

I bet he was still better than 99.9% of the population

Celebrating paganistic images is a prime example why the LORD commands that women are not to teach men.

Hi I have a bible like that the binding is not very good if you could get back to me I could send pics as I would love to find out more about it thanks

Nitroxides baby

Thank you so much for your clear and interesting video. I have been a friend 😁of the I Ching from an age of 17 years. Back then I didnt understand it, but always had and have a huge respect as if the book was alive. Now I,m 54 and when I ask my good old wise friend I Ching a question I can feel its loyal and unconditional energy for guiding me to the best posible choice. Its so profound and mysterious. I am trully greatful to have this friend lying on my bookshelf. Thank you again for your expalnation and bring it to the west of this Earth we live upon.

Would you please post, I John 5:7? Thank you

He is strongly moving towards a mythologization of philosophy and science. We do Not Even know what it really is and he is excluding it by mere feelings.

Optime tibi gratias ago pro tantis informationibus comparandis. Salvete ex Mexico.

What a joy to come across this here, five years later! I grew up as a Presbyterian here in Texas with the Authorized Version alternating with the Revised Standard and my father loved the Knox. Great presentation!

They don't recommend wearing gloves when handling old books now. Said it could actually cause more damage.

New agey what? Grasp? If it’s not christian and it’s a personally spiritual thing, then this word is not derogatory.

And hopeless at just sticking to Atiyah’s names: What the fuck is a ‘twistor’. Spinor itself had the entire theory of Galois field extensions stuck between the ill definedness of algebra and geometry. Spinor is a concept of ill conceivable majesty; you should just call whatever the manifold is a spinor if it’s meant to be a model for this algebro-geometrically ill defined construction that isn’t of a constructive nature. It’s meant to be well-defined. Check the projective geometry notes: Is a projective plane (in the pure sense of concept) meant to orientable or unorientable? If it’s the same thing as in GoS then it’s not going to become a fucking sphere is it!

I think it is naive of Penrose to think that the theoretical impossibility of machines to prove theorems implies that humans are not machines. Humans will never be able to prove all theorems either, simply because some of them take 10^300 symbols to even formulate, let alone prove.

The time limit in chess is often considered absurd. When you introduce a clock to chess, you're no longer measuring the skill of a player but rather their speed. It's akin to the pressure of timed exams, where many students who might have excelled under different conditions fail not because of their abilities but because they run out of time. It's a scenario where the absence of a time constraint could have led to success. So I get you Penrose, i don't like timed chess myself, it puts me in a box😂😂

We're all glad you signed, Michael! Today is your birthday where I live, so happy birthday, sir! As a literature and professional writing student, you're one of my greatest inspirations. Much love from Australia! 💝

Yes, true

I was at Wadham 92-95 so this was incredibly nostalgic for me. Hapoy days! A very accurate picture of life at Wadham, although I don't remember us speaking as posh as this lot! Maybe I just didn't notice.

Full full now online: ua-cam.com/video/xngPWVaiCZ8/v-deo.html

🙏

Thank you so much for this wonderful video! The last quotation from Man in the High Castle was very moving.

Computation is not intelligence. AI is just an oxymoron

Very interesting and well-presented. Thank you. Best wishes from New Zealand.

literally DOZENS of computers!!!

A blast from the past! Would you consider putting the whole video up? I’d love to see it and today’s students could learn about the prehistoric times when we left notes on each other’s doors as no one had mobile phones…

how does this not have more views? extremely well-presented information

I'm so glad. My long-awaited expectation, finally, this wonderful scientist paid attention to this question. Since the distant 1997, I have been very interested in this question. but there was no opportunity to do science. I wish you great luck. I advise you to conduct experiments with acetabulary, acting on it, and finding mechanisms that disrupt the work on the formation of the cytoskeleton. It will be necessary to analyze and then try to change the cytoskeleton in a targeted way. And then it will be possible to get close to the technology of genetic programming of the cytoskeleton.

SHAWAAAANDA!!! 🎉

Thanks for the beautiful and informative presentation. Superb.

Is anyone else getting no audio from the video? I'm getting subtitles which means it must have had audio at the upload stage? Fascinating video, either way. Thanks

I Ching also appears in His Dark Materials by Philip Pullman. It is used by a scientist to communicate with the angels of that universe, who live in different worlds.

"Derivative copyright law" The reason, the word of God is well preserved in the KJV 1611, by the Royal Crown of England, to preserve authenticity for over 400 years now. May God keep you blessed. All glory to God Almighty!

Seems fallacious, thought time limit can't give you a draw in chess?

Good!

Good!

To transcend consiousness un must combine words, numbers and symbols to build the bridge to the unconsious CGJ

Very interesting, I learnt a lot. Thanks.

Love Sir Penrose

I created a new stock market based on the worth () of your life. #POW 2567 Feb 27

I was really bad at chess. So I settled for solving black hole equations, consciousness, and time travel. 😂

Thanks for sharing! Check out some interesting facts about the King James Bible ua-cam.com/video/R9flrGw8294/v-deo.html

Penrose states that Gödel’s incompleteness theorem is an indication that our consciousness is not computational. But I don’t see how Gödel’s theorem necessarily excludes computational processes being involved. Gödel’s theorem just shows that we are able to identify truths that apply within formal systems but which are not derivable by the rules of those systems. Machine learning algorithms also do this all the time - Natural Language Processing is probably the most well known example, which is able to compile facts about language syntax and semantics without using any rules about language whatsoever. There’s nothing inherently non-computational about this sort of process.